Paul’s Life One Post At A Time.

Investors who just ignored Cramer, meanwhile, are far better off than those who sold and did not buy back in.   They did not incur any transaction or tax costs, and they collected (and, hopefully, reinvested) a year's worth of dividends at much lower prices.  If they kept investing regularly or rebalancing as stocks fell, moreover--important parts of a wise investment

strategy--they accumulated a lot more stock at lower prices, thus coming out considerably ahead.

Someone needs to explain why anyone would listen to Jim Cramer.